MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Struve functions

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg75646] Struve functions
  • From: dimitris <dimmechan at>
  • Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 05:40:36 -0400 (EDT)



Consider the indefinite integral of the functions StruveH[n, x] and
StruveL[n, x]

strs = HoldForm[Integrate[{StruveH[n, x], StruveL[n, x]}, x]]

{Integrate[StruveH[n, x], x], Integrate[StruveL[n, x], x]}

It seems that Mathematica can't get the antiderivative of these


strs /. Integrate[f_, o_] :> Integrate[f, {o, 0, t}, Assumptions -> n
> -2]//
{(t^(2 + n)*HypergeometricPFQ[{1, 1 + n/2}, {3/2, 2 + n/2, 3/2 + n}, -
(t^2/4)])/(2^n*((2 + n)*Sqrt[Pi]*Gamma[3/2 + n])), (t^(2 +
n)*HypergeometricPFQ[{1, 1 + n/2}, {3/2, 2 + n/2, 3/2 + n}, t^2/4])/
(2^n*((2 + n)*Sqrt[Pi]*Gamma[3/2 + n]))}

which are indeed antiderivatives of the functions

FunctionExpand[D[ints, t]]
{StruveH[n, t], StruveL[n, t]}

Am I the only one that see an incosistency here or not?
How is it possible, since Mathematica failes to get the indefinite
to evaluate the definite ones (of course I am aware of the table look-
up possibility
and the Marichev-Adamchik Mellin transform methods but I think here is
not the case).

Any insight/explanations?


  • Prev by Date: Struve functions
  • Next by Date: Re: Problem with reading version 4.2 DumpSave files,...
  • Previous by thread: Re: Struve functions
  • Next by thread: Re: Struve functions