Re: Compatibility woes
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg76044] Re: [mg75986] Compatibility woes
- From: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:56:10 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <845718.1179133087873.JavaMail.root@m35>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com
ToPackedArray is available after: << Developer` We're supposed to get the hint from the top-of-the-page heading that says "Developer Package Symbol". Hopefully that works for EVERYTHING in help, if a Get or Needs statement isn't shown? Bobby On Mon, 14 May 2007 02:49:02 -0500, Mark Adler <madler at alumni.caltech.edu> wrote: > I have been using Mathematica since 1.0. For every new version or > update, my previous notebooks have all worked without modification. > > Not so with Version 6. > > Of course, the first clue is that Mathematica offers to fix my old > notebooks when I load them the first time. Get rid of semicolons > after Plot[] and Show[], change Random[] to the new versions, that > sort of thing. That's all somewhat annoying, but I suppose tolerable. > > Then it complains about old packages that, it says, will mess up the > new graphics or other functions. So it complains about loading, for > example, Graphics`Colors`. If I don't load it, I no longer have > DeepSkyBlue, or PaleGreen used as plot line colors. If I do load it, > I am allegedly at risk that something else will be screwed up. > > It can't find Developer`, so how do I get ToPackedArray[]? > > All in all, I am disturbed that after loading only a few notebooks, > I've run into so many incompatibilities. I fear that I've only > scratched the surface, and many more are laying in wait. > > What is the justification for this sudden and flagrant disregard for > backward compatibility? > > Yes, I'm having fun playing with Manipulate[], but I'm wondering if I > made a mistake to download the new version. > > Mark Adler > > > -- DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Compatibility woes
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray@math.umass.edu>
- Re: Re: Compatibility woes