Re: Pattern test and expression sequence

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg83147] Re: [mg83122] Pattern test and expression sequence
• From: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>
• Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:35:21 -0500 (EST)
• References: <3729243.1194879781670.JavaMail.root@m35>

```x__?myQ matches one or more elements, EACH of which must satisfy the myQ
test (by itself). But you want the full List of them to satisfy the test,
as in your workaround, so I'd define it this way:

f[x__]/;myQ[x]:=works[x]

or, for that particular test... (Length[{x}] > 1)...

f[first_,others__]:=works[first,others]

Bobby

On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:11:00 -0600, Jan Lellmann
<lellmann at uni-mannheim.de> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I want to define a pattern that accepts a sequence of expressions (of
> arbitrary length) that matches some condition. So as a minimalist
> example, if I wanted to accept all expressions with f as head and at
> least 2 arguments, I want to write
>
> myQ[x__] := (Print[x]; Length[{x}] > 1)
> f[x__?myQ] := works[x];
> f[1, 2]
>
> This should print "1 2" and return "works[1,2]". But it doesn't, it just
> prints "1" and returns f[1,2] unevaluated. So apparenty Mathematica does
> not pass the complete expression sequence to myQ, but only the first
> element ("1").
>
> There is a workaround using /; :
> f[x__] /; (myQ[x] == True) := works[x];
>
> but it is rather ugly and cumbersome when there is more than one
> argument.
>
> Does anyone have an idea why Mathematica does this? Is it a bug? Or is
> there a (nice) workaround?
>
> Best regards,
>    Jan
>
>

--

DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com

```

• Prev by Date: Re: Dividers formatting in Grid
• Next by Date: Re: Zoom2D and GetGraphicsCoordinates palettes combined
• Previous by thread: Re: Pattern test and expression sequence
• Next by thread: Latex export in 6.0 problems