MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: FrameLabel in v6.0

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg82029] Re: FrameLabel in v6.0
  • From: Xerxes <saul.cohen at>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 04:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <><fe7i1m$oto$>

On Oct 6, 4:46 am, Curtis Osterhoudt <c... at> wrote:
> Confirmed here ("6.0 for Linux x86 (32-bit) (June 19, 2007)"). However, it
> seems that usingRasterizeis the culprit. If I remove theRasterizecommand
> and options, things look fine.

You're right, it's definitely a bug in Rasterize. FrameLabel is
obviously being
interpreted incorrectly when the RasterSize is greater than the
I've been using it because in v6.0, ImageResolution no longer appears
to be
working. All raster-type graphics get dumped out with a pixel size
equal to
the ImageSize. Since changing the image size is unacceptable, I
pre-rasterizing would help.

Does anyone know a workaround for either the Rasterize bug or the
ImageResolution bug?

Saul Cohen

  • Prev by Date: Inserting a picture!
  • Next by Date: Matrices
  • Previous by thread: Re: FrameLabel in v6.0
  • Next by thread: simulink model import