[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: "dereference" variable
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg82074] Re: [mg82033] "dereference" variable
*From*: DrMajorBob <drmajorbob at bigfoot.com>
*Date*: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:22:00 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <22397821.1192019277612.JavaMail.root@m35>
*Reply-to*: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com
Possibly this will make it clearer:
Clear[type, m, p, q, k]
SetAttributes[type, HoldFirst];
type[arg : Sum[x_, it_]] = {"Sum", HoldForm[arg], arg};
type[arg : Times[x_, y_]] = {"Times", HoldForm[arg], arg};
type[x_Symbol] = {"Symbol", HoldForm[x], x};
m1[x_] := Module[{s = Sum[x, {i, 1, 20}]}, type[s]]
m2[x_] := type[Evaluate@Sum[x, {i, 1, 20}]]
m3[x_] := type[Sum[x, {i, 1, 20}]]
m1[k]
{Symbol,s$1748,20 k}
m2[k]
{Times,20 k,20 k}
m3[k]
{Sum,\!\(
\*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(i = 1\), \(20\)]k\),20 k}
m1 passes s as a symbol (setting s beforehand has no effect), m2 evaluat=
es =
the sum to a product, and m3 passes the Sum unevaluated.
Bobby
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:22:56 -0500, Todd Johnson <johnsong at ics.uci.edu> =
=
wrote:
> I tried posting this on the Wolfram.com student forums, but got no =
> response. A friend suggested that I try this forum as well.
>
> I have a Mathematica question I'm hoping someone here can help with, =
> because it seems fundamental, but it's been bothering me for a long =
> time. My basic question is "is there a way pass a local variable to a =
=
> function in a state between 'unevaluated' and 'evaluated,' which might=
=
> correspond to something like 'dereferenced.'"
>
> Here is a bit of code I've written which demonstrates the problem:
>
> Clear[L, M, P, Q, k]
> SetAttributes[L, HoldFirst];
>
> L[Sum[x_, it_]] := Print["here."];
> L[Times[x_, y_]] := Print["there."];
> L[x_Symbol] := Print["nowhere."];
>
> M[x_] :=
> Module[{s},
> s = Sum[x, {i, 1, 20}];
> L[s]
> ];
> P[x_] :=
> Module[{s},
> s = Unevaluated[Sum[x, {i, 1, 20}]];
> L[s]
> ];
> Q[x_] :=
> Module[{s},
> s = Unevaluated[Sum[x, {i, 1, 20}]];
> L[Evaluate[s]]
> ];
>
> Let me try to explain/motivate this. Suppose that L is some function =
> which cares about the difference between summation and multiplication,=
=
> and uses pattern matching to tell the difference. Suppose further that=
L =
> receives input from some other function. I've shown three ways of =
> writing that function: M, P, and Q. Here are the three functions, with=
=
> their corresponding outputs:
>
> In: M[k]
> Out: nowhere.
>
> In: P[k]
> Out: nowhere.
>
> In: Q[k]
> Out: there.
>
> None of these is what I want, which is "here," and which can be achiev=
ed =
> by passing input directly to L:
>
> In: L[Sum[k, {i, 1, 20}]]
> Out: here.
>
> Why don't the three functions M, P, and Q work? M and P leave "s" =
> completely unevaluated, so that what L actually receives is a value li=
ke =
> "s$123456". Q, on the other hand, evaluates "s" entirely, and arrives =
at =
> "20*k". You may wonder, "but wait, that is what s evaluates to, why =
> can't your code deal with that?" The simplest answer is that sometimes=
=
> Mathematica seems to decide erroneously that the summation can be turn=
ed =
> into multiplication, which leaves me with dummy variables from =
> summations lying around unbound. Also, this is a problem at other time=
s, =
> such as when there is an appreciable difference between "x[[i]]-x[[i]]=
" =
> and "0", because I really mean "x[[i]]" to stand in for some vector of=
=
> as-yet-unknown length, so that it minus itself is a zero vector, which=
=
> is different from plain 0.
>
> So, does anyone know of a way to write a function which gets the =
> expression out of "s", but doesn't evaluate it completely?
>
>
-- =
DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: How much memory is needed?**
Next by Date:
**Re: "dereference" variable**
Previous by thread:
**Re: "dereference" variable**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: "dereference" variable**
| |