[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Ordering function weird?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg82693] Re: Ordering function weird?
*From*: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
*Date*: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 04:10:00 -0500 (EST)
*Organization*: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
*References*: <ffv29v$aph$1@smc.vnet.net>
Claus wrote:
> say I've got two sets of number, x and y, which I want to rank. See the
> example below. I totally expect and want the result of Ordering[x]. But
> I neiter understand nor expect the result of Ordering[y]. Both Sort[x]
> and Sort[{1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 1, 2}] are ok.
From the online help, "Ordering[list] gives the *positions* in list at
which each successive element of Sort[list] appears." (Emphasize added.)
In other words, *Ordering* returns a list of _indices_ rather than a
list of sorted elements. For instance, Ordering[{1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 1, 2}]
returns the list of indices {1, 6, 2, 7, 3, 4, 5} that must be read as,
"If one wants the list of integers {1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 1, 2} in ascending
order (the default), one must take the first integer of the original
list (i.e. one), then the sixth integer (i.e. one again but at a
different position), then the second (i.e. two), then the seventh (i.e.
two again but also at a different position), then the third (i.e.
seven), then the fourth (i.e. eight, and finally the fifth (i.e. nine)
resulting in the new sorted in ascending order list {1, 1, 2, 2, 7, 8,
9}, list which is identical to what is returned by Sort[{1, 2, 7, 8, 9,
1, 2}].
In[1]:= x = {1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 3, 4};
y = {1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 1, 2};
Sort[x]
Sort[y]
Out[3]= {1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 6, 10}
Out[4]= {1, 1, 2, 2, 7, 8, 9}
In[5]:= Ordering[x]
Ordering[y]
Out[5]= {1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 4, 5}
Out[6]= {1, 6, 2, 7, 3, 4, 5}
In[7]:= x[[%%]]
y[[%%]]
Out[7]= {1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 6, 10}
Out[8]= {1, 1, 2, 2, 7, 8, 9}
In[9]:= {x[[Ordering[x]]] === Sort[x], y[[Ordering[y]]] === Sort[y]}
Out[9]= {True, True}
Regards,
--
Jean-Marc
Prev by Date:
**Re: Graphics export to BMP and JPEG**
Next by Date:
**Re: Mathematica not considering an assumption**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Ordering function weird?**
Next by thread:
**Default font does not look good**
| |