|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: "Accumulate" in Mathematica 6
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg82818] Re: "Accumulate" in Mathematica 6
- From: Thomas E Burton <tburton at brahea.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:22:59 -0500 (EST)
Perhaps Wolfram will speak for themselves. My take is this:
Accumulating a list of numbers seems to be about 3 times faster than
the alternative using FoldList. This application is very common,
perhaps justifying this new, apparently redundant specialized
function. And as you suggest, for the other applications, FoldList
[f,e1,g[e2,e3]] is equivalent to version 1's Accumulate[f,g
[e1,e2,e3]]. So version 6 seems to offer a decent compromise.
It also seems to me that one objective of version 6 is to broaden
appeal by lessening idiosyncrasies. To reintroduce version 1's
idiosyncratic take on "accumulate" would seem counterproductive.
> Maybe I'm missing something here - but what was the rationale
> behind re-implementing "Accumulate" in such a restricted version now?
Prev by Date:
Re: Easy Mapping problem that has me stumped!
Next by Date:
ANN: ColorbarPlot
Previous by thread:
Re: "Accumulate" in Mathematica 6
Next by thread:
Re: "Accumulate" in Mathematica 6
|