[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Anomolous behaviour of Penrose Triangle Demonstration
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg81135] Re: Anomolous behaviour of Penrose Triangle Demonstration
*From*: WetBlanket <Wyvern864 at gmail.com>
*Date*: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:32:52 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <200709110923.FAA26497@smc.vnet.net><fc8689$lqa$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Sep 12, 2:59 am, Curtis Osterhoudt <c... at lanl.gov> wrote:
> Hi, Syd,
>
> I have no real insight. I confirm that changing the ViewPoint prefactor
> causes the same behavior on my machine. I did not try to evaluate the code
> which allows "vp" to be changed via a slider; just rotating the graphic
> produced by the first chunk of code causes part of it to disappear (somewhat
> randomly).
> Of course, I've been having lots of problems with my ATI drivers not being
> compatible with Mathematica 6.0's Graphics3D[] objects, so this may be a
> symptom of that.
>
> This is on "6.0 for Linux x86 (32-bit) (June 19, 2007)".
>
> On Tuesday 11 September 2007 03:23:52 you wrote:
>
>
>
> > I would appreciate some insight regarding the Penrose Triangle
> > Demonstration which can be found at:-
>
> > http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/PenroseTriangle/
>
> > The original source I downloaded when run on my machine displayed a
> > blank panel!
> > (The demonstration ran fine on my machine in "watch web preview" mode!)
>
> > $Version Out[1]= "6.0 for Mac OS X x86 (32-bit) (June 19, 2007)"
>
> > The demonstration source was;-
>
> > Manipulate[
> > cu[x_, y_, z_, d_] :=
> > Cuboid[ {x - d/2, y - d/2, z - d/2}, {x + d/2, y + d/2, z + d/2} ];
> > Graphics3D[
> > {Opacity[o],
> > cu[0, 15, 30, 7.5], cu[15, 45, 0, 7.5],
> > Table[cu[0, 0, 15 n, 7.5], {n, 0, 3}],
> > Table[cu[0, 15 n, 0, 7.5], {n, 3}]
> > } ,
> > ViewPoint -> 200 {-1, -1, 1},
> > Boxed -> False,
> > PlotRange -> 50 {{-1, 0.8}, {-0.6, 1}, {-0.08, 1}},
> > ImageSize -> {400, 400}
> > ],
> > {{o, 1, "opacity"}, 0, 1}, TrackedSymbols :> Manipulate]
>
> > I changed the "viewpoint factor" in ViewPoint -> 200 {-1, -1, 1}
> > above to 100{-1, -1, 1} on a hunch and the panel
> > displayed correctly.
>
> > After failing to find any documentation for the use of the "viewpoint
> > factor" I tried setting a range for vp and generating a slider in
> > addition to opacity to see the effects.
>
> > Manipulate[
> > cu[x_, y_, z_, d_] :=
> > Cuboid[ {x - d/2, y - d/2, z - d/2}, {x + d/2, y + d/2, z + d/2} ];
> > Graphics3D[
> > {Opacity[o],
> > cu[0, 15, 30, 7.5], cu[15, 45, 0, 7.5],
> > Table[cu[0, 0, 15 n, 7.5], {n, 0, 3}],
> > Table[cu[0, 15 n, 0, 7.5], {n, 3}]
> > } ,
> > ViewPoint -> vp {-1, -1, 1},
> > Boxed -> False,
> > PlotRange -> 50 {{-1, 0.8}, {-0.6, 1}, {-0.08, 1}},
> > ImageSize -> {400, 400}
> > ],
> > {{o, 1, "opacity"}, 0, 1}, {{vp, 10, "ViewPoint Factor"}, 10,
> > 200, 10},
> > TrackedSymbols :> Manipulate]
>
> > The effects of using the vp slider are very odd. Bits of the graphic
> > start disappearing!
>
> > Any clues as to what is happening here would be appreciated.
>
> > Yet another strange "feature" showed up when I tried to "Save As" the
> > modified demonstration code.
>
> > I cannot successfully save the modified demonstration.
>
> > I suspect that is a WRI safeguard for protecting the integrity of the
> > Demonstrations Project (which is fine by me).
>
> > I can of course save the modified code in a new blank notebook.
>
> > Syd Geraghty
>
> --
> ==========================================================
> Curtis Osterhoudt
> cfo at remove_this.lanl.and_this.gov
> PGP Key ID: 0x4DCA2A10
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments
> Seehttp://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> ==========================================================
I am running on a Dell XPS Laptop using Windows XT and the code seems
to work -- nothing much happens when I move the viewpoint slider --
the display moves slightly -- nothing more.
Gary
Prev by Date:
** Re: Slow Show/Graphics in v6.0**
Next by Date:
**Re: help plot log[f[t]] vs a parameter using an ODE**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Anomolous behaviour of Penrose Triangle Demonstration**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Anomalous behaviour of Penrose Triangle Demonstration**
| |