Re: If Integrate returns no result, can we conclude that no

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg87822] Re: If Integrate returns no result, can we conclude that no*From*: samuel.blake at maths.monash.edu.au*Date*: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:38:23 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <fu4lpc$sk9$1@smc.vnet.net> <200804170233.WAA21093@smc.vnet.net>

On Apr 17, 9:01 pm, "David W. Cantrell" <DWCantr... at sigmaxi.net> wrote: > Andrzej Kozlowski wrote: > > On 17 Apr 2008, at 11:33, David W.Cantrell wrote: > >>> Szabolcs_Horv=E1t <szhor... at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> The documentation says: > > >>> "In the most convenient cases, integrals can be done purely in > >>> terms of elementary functions such as exponentials, logarithms and > >>> trigonometric functions. In fact, if you give an integrand that > >>> involves only such elementary functions, then one of the important > >>> capabilities of Integrate is that if the corresponding integral > >>> can be expressed in terms of elementary functions, then Integrate > >>> will essentially always succeed in finding it." > > >>>http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/IntegralsThatCanAnd..=

**References**:**Re: If Integrate returns no result, can we conclude that no closed-form***From:*"David W.Cantrell" <DWCantrell@sigmaxi.net>