[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: If Integrate returns no result, can we conclude that no

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg87822] Re: If Integrate returns no result, can we conclude that no
• From: samuel.blake at maths.monash.edu.au
• Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <fu4lpc$sk9$1@smc.vnet.net> <200804170233.WAA21093@smc.vnet.net>

On Apr 17, 9:01 pm, "David W. Cantrell" <DWCantr... at sigmaxi.net>
wrote:
> Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 17 Apr 2008, at 11:33, David W.Cantrell wrote:
> >>> Szabolcs_Horv=E1t <szhor... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> The documentation says:
>
> >>> "In the most convenient cases, integrals can be done purely in
> >>> terms of elementary functions such as exponentials, logarithms and
> >>> trigonometric functions. In fact, if you give an integrand that
> >>> involves only such elementary functions, then one of the important
> >>> capabilities of Integrate is that if the corresponding integral
> >>> can be expressed in terms of elementary functions, then Integrate
> >>> will essentially always succeed in finding it."
>
> >>>http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/tutorial/IntegralsThatCanAnd..=

• References:
  • Re: If Integrate returns no result, can we conclude that no closed-form
    • From: "David W.Cantrell" <DWCantrell@sigmaxi.net>