Re: Re: Re: Warning for use of 3D Graphics manipulation
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg91087] Re: [mg91046] Re: Re: Warning for use of 3D Graphics manipulation
- From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 05:02:42 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <48981EC6.email@example.com>
I don't think, that the simple graphics of Mathematica can overheat the chip.
AFAIK the problem comes form a insufficient cooling in the laptop.
You should ask your laptop manufacturer if you model apply to the
problems. But official neither nVidia nor a laptop manufacturer have
confirmed the problems.
Alexei Boulbitch wrote:
> Dear Team, dear Jens,
> it would be very helpful, if you can give a hint on requirements to
> graphic chips of the laptops to avoid this problem. I am just going to
> buy one.
> Best, Alexei
>> that is not a problem of Mathematica, this is a problem of
>> the nVidia chips for laptops. Any complex 3d scene may burn the
>> chip. You don't need Mathematica for that, Crisis or Half Life will
>> burn the graphics chip better and faster than Mathematica *and*
>> for a more affordable prize !
>> *AND* if your VGA signal on an external monitor is still right,
>> you graphics chip is ok, but you lcd-display may be broken and this
>> has *nothing* to do with the overheating of the GeForce mobile chips.
> Roland Franzius wrote:
>>> After installing Mathematica 6 and programming some group-mechanical
>>> 3D-manipulations the nvidia go graphics chip of my Samsung laptop
>>> stopped working at the performance of a complex 3d-manipulation. Its
>>> internal digital lcd-part gave up with a crack noise. The external
>>> analog VGA is still working.
>>> On the internet, some hints can be found saying that certain laptop
>>> computers are in danger to burn their graphics chips because of
>>> insufficent cooling under high permanent load.
Prev by Date:
Re: Derivative of Dot
Next by Date:
Re: Please help me.....
Previous by thread:
Re: Use of RuleDelayed in PaneSelector
Next by thread:
simple pattern match question