Re: Integration Program of Burr Distribution
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg91565] Re: [mg91545] Integration Program of Burr Distribution
- From: Daniel Lichtblau <danl at wolfram.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:44:09 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200808260730.DAA23794@smc.vnet.net>
Dewi Anggraini wrote: > Dear All > > I'd like to calculate the upper specification limit of Burr Distribution from my data below: > > n = 69; > x1 = {3, 5, 6, 14, 11, 7, 7, 10, 11, 5, 4, 19, 9, 2, 8, 5, 6, 6, 5, > 5, > 4, 5, 5, 6, 8, 5, 8, 6, 5, 16, 5, 18, 16, 21, 6, 3, 16, 8, 3, > 8, > 11, 2, 3, 4, 8, 7, 9, 10, 8, 11, 8, 10, 9, 12, 12, 9, 6, 12, > 3, 9, > 14, 7, 4, 13, 8, 14, 5, 8, 2}; > > with the initialisation pdf of Burr as follows: > > BurrDistribution[x1_, c_, > k_] := (c*k)*(x1^(c - 1)/(1 + x1^c)^(k + 1)) > pdf = BurrDistribution[x1, c, k] > > I already got the parameter value of c and k through MLE: > > logl = Plus @@ Log[pdf] > maxlogl = FindMinimum[{-logl, c > 0 && k > 0}, {c, 1}, {k, 2}, > MaxIterations -> 1000] > mle = maxlogl[[2]] > > However, when I wanna calculate the integration of Burr with the value of c=37.8115, k=0.0135614 and x1 limit = [8, Infinity] to get the probability of data fall outside the upper specification limit given {8} with this program below: > > In[2]:= Integrate[pdf[37.81151579009424, 0.01356141249769735, t], > {t, 8, Infinity}] > > Out[2]= Integrate[pdf[37.81151579009424, 0.01356141249769735, t], > {t, 8, Infinity}] > > That gives me the repetation not a real number. > > Why is this happen? Do I make mistake somewhere? Because when I did the similar program towards Gamma Distribution, it works well. > > I look forward for your reply and assistance. I highly appreciate the suggestions you contribute to my minor thesis. > > Thank You. > Regards, > Dewi Among the obvious problems: (1) You defined pdf to be a (very large) list, not a function of three parameters. (2) Your integration occurs at In[2]. This means you could not have (re)defined all the necessary information for pdf. I would surmise you used Quit[] or otherwise restarted your kernel, and did not redefine things. More subtle: (3) I doubt your MLE is what you intend. You minimized a sum of logs of functions of data values (ordinates, or y values). They are in no way related to the abscissae, or x values. These, I presume, are meant to be values 1,2,...,69. Also, you will require a sum of discrepancie measures (absolute values, or maybe squares). So I think your MLE optimization should involve an expression such as logtot below. pdflist = BurrDistribution[Range[n], c, k]; logtot = Total[Abs[PowerExpand[Log[pdflist]] - Log[x1]]]; Or possibly it could just use tot = Total[Abs[pdflist - x1]]; And you could get the optimal values via minlogl = FindMinimum[{logtot, c > 0 && k > 0}, {c, 1}, {k, 2}, MaxIterations -> 1000]; mle = minlogl[[2]] If you now define pdf[t_, c_, k_] := BurrDistribution[t, c, k] (note order of arguments) then you can do quadrature as below. Observe that one can use mle to substitute numeric values for the parameters; you do not (and should not) cut/paste from the earlier computation. NIntegrate[pdf[t, c, k] /. mle, {t, 8, Infinity}] Daniel Lichtblau Wolfram Research
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Integration Program of Burr Distribution
- From: Darren Glosemeyer <darreng@wolfram.com>
- Re: Re: Integration Program of Burr Distribution
- References:
- Integration Program of Burr Distribution
- From: "Dewi Anggraini" <dewi_anggraini@student.rmit.edu.au>
- Integration Program of Burr Distribution