[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Weights in NonlinearRegress / NonlinearFit. Versus data errors
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg85326] Weights in NonlinearRegress / NonlinearFit. Versus data errors
*From*: "Kristof Lebecki" <lebecki-hates-SPAM at ifpan.edu.pl>
*Date*: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 05:38:34 -0500 (EST)
Dear all,
Introduction: it happens that we, physicists have to fit a given function
y(x) to a set of experimentally derived points {x_i,y_i}, i=1..n. I use for
that NonlinearRegress.
It happenes, however, that the experimental points are known with different
accuracy. (We call usually such inaccuracy as an error.) Assume that we have
a vector of triples {x_i,y_i,dy_i}, i=1..n. Now, dy_i describes the
"y-error" of every point we want to fit.
My first idea was to use Weights for that. Weights defined as:
{w_i}= {1/dy_i} (the smaller the error the higher the weight).
But my experienced colleague pointed out that what actually is here
minimized is: chi^2= \sum_i w_i*(e_i)^2. He prefers that sum to be
dimensionless, thus he argues that the weights should be defined as:
{w_i}= {1/(dy_i)^2}
And what is your opinion?
Regards, Kris
Prev by Date:
**Re: Domains**
Next by Date:
**Re: Positioning in CellFrameLabels**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Quantum Commutator**
Next by thread:
**Re: Weights in NonlinearRegress / NonlinearFit. Versus data errors**
| |