MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: calculating an inverse matrix

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg85339] Re: calculating an inverse matrix
  • From: Alois Steindl <Alois.Steindl at>
  • Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:36:18 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <fo9fvk$sap$>

"michael.goossens at" <michael.goossens at> writes:

> So far I know the method of Gauss-Jordan(with pivot to reduce
> instability), but are there other(better) methods to calculate an
> inverse matrix?
maybe the best method is to avoid the calculation at all.
The explicit inverse matrix is necessary only very rarely, usually the
factorization is much more efficient, especially when the matrix has
some special structure, eg. is tridiagonal.

Alois Steindl,                           Tel.: +43 (1) 58801 / 32558      
Inst. for Mechanics and Mechatronics     Fax.: +43 (1) 58801 / 32598
Vienna University of Technology,         A-1040 Wiedner Hauptstr. 8-10   

  • Prev by Date: Bug in the FourierSinCoefficient function
  • Next by Date: Re: Weights in NonlinearRegress / NonlinearFit. Versus data errors
  • Previous by thread: Re: calculating an inverse matrix
  • Next by thread: Plot function of a function of a variable