MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Better way to write this

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg85076] Re: Better way to write this
  • From: Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:45:38 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <fnet45$id5$1@smc.vnet.net>

On Jan 26, 1:05 am, Louis Theran <the... at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have the following function that takes as its input a number of
> lists and returns the elements in each of them that appear exactly
> once:
>
> SpecialElements[lists:_List..]:=
> Module[{l,n,Sower,Reaper},
> l = {lists}; n = Length[l];
> Sower[l_,{idx_}]:= Sow[idx,{#}] & /@ l;
> Reaper[val_,{place_}] := Sow[val,place];
> Reaper[val_,x_]:= Null;
> Reap[Reap[MapIndexed[Sower, l],_,Reaper],Range[n]][[2]]]
>
> This works pretty well, but since I am using it on rather large
> inputs, I was wondering if there is a faster way to implement it than
> Reap/Sow, which is sort of counting in unary.
>
> ^L

I haven't tried these, but any one of them should return a
list of the elements that appear exactly once in its argument.
Mapping across your list of lists would then give what you want.

f1[v_List] := Flatten@Select[Split@Sort@v,Length@#==1&]

f2[v_List] := Select[Union@v,Count[v,#]==1&]

f3[v_List] := Pick[Sequence@@Transpose@Tally@v,1]


  • Prev by Date: Re: Wavelet "filter"?
  • Next by Date: Re: Better way to write this
  • Previous by thread: Re: Better way to write this
  • Next by thread: Re: Better way to write this