|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Parallelising NDSolve
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg90351] Re: Parallelising NDSolve
- From: szabolcs.rozgonyi at gmail.com
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 05:05:20 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <g4q9pp$eb9$1@smc.vnet.net>
Hi,
dividing the domain into two slices over you want to calculate the
diff.eq could work. (And then, of course, you have to reassemble the
result when the two separate run of NDSolve have finished.)
Cheers,
Szabolcs
On Jul 6, 1:20 pm, Alex Butler <abut... at ics.mq.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Occasionally the data that NDSolve generates is too large for the
> Windows Process Address Space of my PC. I have a dual core machine and
> was wondering if it were possible to split NDSolve between these two
> processors, thus doubling the amount of Process Address Space available
> to NDSolve.
>
> Firstly, can NDSolve be parallelised? And secondly, what's the best way
> to go about it?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
Prev by Date:
Re: Set::setraw error
Next by Date:
Re: Extracting terms of a polynomial into a list and then multiply
Previous by thread:
Re: Parallelising NDSolve
Next by thread:
distribution fitting
|