Re: Question about diference between Animate and Manipulate
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg90456] Re: Question about diference between Animate and Manipulate
- From: "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <g51ugl$71h$1@smc.vnet.net>
Well, they have a different appearance and a different set of options. Nevertheless Manipulate can usually substitute for Animate. While we are on the subject of Animate, I wonder if anyone else has problems with 'sticky' Animates? That is, ones that stop after a certain amount of time, even though the AnimationRepetitions has a default value of Infinity. If one clicks the Pause/Play control they will usually start and run for a while and then stop again. For example, this happens for me with the second example in the Animate Help. Animate[ArrayPlot[CellularAutomaton[n, {{1}, 0}, {40, All}]], {n, 0, 255, 1}] Also, would it be possible to obtain an animation that ran in a particular way without any controls at all? Now, Animate has a minimun mandatory set of controls. -- David Park djmpark at comcast.net http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/ "Camille JORDAN" <ynceraj at gmail.com> wrote in message news:g51ugl$71h$1 at smc.vnet.net... > Have a question. > Reading the documentation of Mathematica 6.0.3 for Animate and > Manipulate does not seem to be a lot of a diference between the > Animate and the Manipulate command. > Can someone point me what is the biggest difference between them? > Seems to me they are the same. >
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Question about diference between Animate and
- From: Syd Geraghty <sydgeraghty@mac.com>
- Re: Re: Question about diference between Animate and