Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Question about diference between Animate and Manipulate

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg90456] Re: Question about diference between Animate and Manipulate
  • From: "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <g51ugl$71h$1@smc.vnet.net>

Well, they have a different appearance and a different set of options. 
Nevertheless Manipulate can usually substitute for Animate.

While we are on the subject of Animate, I wonder if anyone else has problems 
with 'sticky' Animates? That is, ones that stop after a certain amount of 
time, even though the AnimationRepetitions has a default value of Infinity. 
If one clicks the Pause/Play control they will usually start and run for a 
while and then stop again. For example, this happens for me with the second 
example in the Animate Help.

Animate[ArrayPlot[CellularAutomaton[n, {{1}, 0}, {40, All}]], {n, 0,
  255, 1}]

Also, would it be possible to obtain an animation that ran in a particular 
way without any controls at all? Now, Animate has a minimun mandatory set of 
controls.

-- 
David Park
djmpark at comcast.net
http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/


"Camille JORDAN" <ynceraj at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:g51ugl$71h$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> Have a question.
> Reading the documentation of Mathematica 6.0.3 for Animate and
> Manipulate does not seem to be a lot of a diference between the
> Animate and the Manipulate command.
> Can someone point me what is the biggest difference between them?
> Seems to me they are the same.
> 



  • Prev by Date: Re: Trouble related to "CSV"
  • Next by Date: Re: Solving a DE using Mathematica
  • Previous by thread: Question about diference between Animate and Manipulate
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Question about diference between Animate and