Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: What does FullForm[ ] actually do?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg90493] Re: What does FullForm[ ] actually do?
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:32:16 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: Uni Leipzig
  • References: <g54oj0$eu9$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de

Hi,

all functions without the Hold* attribute
evaluate the arguments until the arguments
don't change anymore and call *than* the outer function.
You have to use HoldForm[] when you want to see
Set[y,List[Plus[a,b]]]

Regards
   Jens

AES wrote:
> I'm having trouble grasping just what it is that FullForm[ ] does.  For 
> example:
> 
> 1)  Page 424 of the M5 Book says:
> 
>       "FullForm[expr] shows the internal form of an 
>        expression in explicit functional notation"
> 
> and gives a moderately complex example of this.  
> 
> I don't find it clearly stated, however, there or anywhere else in the 
> immediately accessible M5 or M6 documentation, whether executing 
> "FullForm[expr]" also executes the "expr" itself, although some 
> experimenting seems to show that it does.  If so, perhaps the 
> documentation ought to make this clear. . . ?
> 
> 2)  Then, just as an example, executing FullForm[y = {a+b}] gives (that 
> is, Prints, or displays on screen) only the output List[a,b] -- the "y 
> =" is gone.
> 
> But isn't the full expr that's operated on by FullForm, or that forms 
> the argument of FullForm[expr], the complete expression "y = {a+b}".  
> That's what fits the stated syntax of the FullForm[expr] command -- and 
> moreover, page 230 of the M5 Book says:
> 
>      2.1.1  Everything Is an Expression   
> 
>      "...everything you type into M is  treated as an expression."
> 
> Isn't the "y = " part typed in as part of expr also?  Doesn't it have to 
> have some form of "internal form"? 
> 
> 3)  Even without the "y =" part, suppose we execute either of the inputs 
> FullForm[y={a+b};]  or  FullForm[{a+b};] (with a semicolon added).  
> 
> Either of these gives us back the displayed result "Null" -- but the 
> first of them also sets the value of y to {a+b}, confirming that the 
> complete expression inside the FullForm brackets was indeed executed.
> 
> But what is it that's "null" here?  The "{a+b}" or even the "{a+b};" 
> part clearly isn't null, since it gets put into y in the first form.  
> And isn't ";" (the semicolon) also an expression, and also part of the 
> "{a+b};" expression?  ("Everything in M is an expression.")   Don't both 
> ; and {a+b}; have to have an internal form?
> 
> The bottom line seems to be that FullForm[{a+b}], when executed, in some 
> cases does as claimed "show the internal form of that  expression in 
> explicit functional notation." 
> 
> However, the FullForm[{a+b};] or FullForm[y={a+b};] examples seem to 
> show that executing FullForm[expr] returns the result of executing that 
> expr, not the expression itself . . . ?
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: Almost symbolic computations (?)
  • Next by Date: Re: running multiple mathkernel's
  • Previous by thread: Re: What does FullForm[ ] actually do?
  • Next by thread: Re: What does FullForm[ ] actually do?