|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: exclusions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg86356] Re: exclusions
- From: ucervan at gmail.com
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:02:56 -0500 (EST)
- References: <fqtqp5$db0$1@smc.vnet.net>
Use Exclusions->{x==1} or even Exclusions->1.0001
When an exclusion is given in the form of isolated points, we only cut
the current line at the prescribed value, which may not always succeed
in finding the correct offset around the point as in this case. If an
equation is given, a more elaborated sampling/refinement method is
used which will try to get a better bound around the singularity/jump.
-Ulises Cervantes
WRI
Prev by Date:
Re: Another Mathematica 6 bug?
Next by Date:
Re: How to use Thread when second argument to function is a list of lists?
Previous by thread:
Re: exclusions
Next by thread:
Re: exclusions
|