Re: symbolize in v.6
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg86487] Re: symbolize in v.6
- From: "Steve Luttrell" <steve at _removemefirst_luttrell.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:14:42 -0500 (EST)
- References: <fqtqhc$d1v$1@smc.vnet.net> <200803090959.EAA12280@smc.vnet.net> <fr5e61$oas$1@smc.vnet.net>
ISTR = "I seem to remember" For the meaning of this and other acronyms check out the netlingo dictionary at http://www.netlingo.com/. I have tried to reproduce your error message, and I find that if I execute Notation/tutorial/NotationSymbolizeAndInfixNotation without first of all executing the <<Notation` at the top of the tutorial, then I get the following message Syntax::sntxb: Expression cannot begin with "\!\(\(x_\)\(\ \)SubscriptBox[\(\[CirclePlus]\), \(n_\)]\(\ \)\(y_\)\(\ \)\)\[DoubleLongLeftRightArrow] gplus[x_,y_,n_]". Syntax::sntxi: Incomplete expression; more input is needed. This might be the cause of your problem. Stephen Luttrell West Malvern, UK "Jaccard Florian" <Florian.Jaccard at he-arc.ch> wrote in message news:fr5e61$oas$1 at smc.vnet.net... > Hello Steve and everybody, > > Thanks for your answer. > As you are the only one who answered, I ask for more information, if you > allow? > > What does mean "ISTR" ? > > I'm afraid I have a big problem. > If I go in the tutorial > Notation/tutorial/NotationSymbolizeAndInfixNotation, > I just try the 3 first Inputs and already have an error-message: > > Syntax::sntxi: Incomplete expression; more input is needed. > > So there is no doubt : The package Notation` just doesn't work on my > computer! I tried on the computer of a colleague in the same office, and > it works fine on his computer... could the problem be in my computer? > > I use : > > In[3]:= $System > > Out[3]= "Microsoft Windows (32-bit)" > > In[4]:= $Version > > Out[4]= "6.0 for Microsoft Windows (32-bit) (February 7, 2008)" > > Computer : HP Compaq nx7010 > > (It's the 6.0.2.0 version. It didn't work neither on 6.0.1) > > > Could other user try the tutorial examples and let me know if they also > have problems or not? I can't believe being the only one... and I would > like to understand... > > Thanks in advance! > > > Florian Jaccard > > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De=A0: Steve Luttrell [mailto:steve at _removemefirst_luttrell.org.uk] > Envoy=E9=A0: dimanche, 9. mars 2008 11:00 > =C0=A0: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net > Objet=A0: Re: symbolize in v.6 > > I have version 6.0.1 for Windows 32-bit, and all of > Notation/tutorial/NotationSymbolizeAndInfixNotation works correctly. = > ISTR > that version 6 did not work correctly. > > Stephen Luttrell > West Malvern, UK > > "Jaccard Florian" <Florian.Jaccard at he-arc.ch> wrote in message > news:fqtqhc$d1v$1 at smc.vnet.net... >> Hello! >> >> In 5.2, I used to be able to use subscripted variables (which were >> treated as symbols) loading the Notation package and writing : >> Symbolize[ParsedBoxWrapper[\(_ \_ _\)]] >> It worked fine... >> >> With version 6, the help says it should still work. But I'm afraid I >> can't even try the examples in the help! >> >> The help says : >> >> << "Notation`" >> >> Symbolize[ParsedBoxWrapper[\(expr_ \_ Rule\)]] ]] >> >> FullForm[Subscript[MyDistribute, Rule]] >> >> Should give: >> >> FullForm[MyDistribute\[UnderBracket]Subscript\ >> \[UnderBracket]Rule] >> >> But in 6.0.2 on my system, it gives : >> >> FullForm[Subscript[MyDistribute, Rule]] >> >> So there is no doubt : Symbolize doesn't work anymore... >> I didn't try the other features of the Notation palette, but I would = > be >> glad if somebody else would try the examples of >> Notation/tutorial/NotationSymbolizeAndInfixNotation >> And tell if it works or not! >> >> Thanks for help! >> >> Florian Jaccard >> >> >> >> > > >
- References:
- Re: symbolize in v.6
- From: "Steve Luttrell" <steve@_removemefirst_luttrell.org.uk>
- Re: symbolize in v.6