Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None] fails

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg88875] Re: [mg88838] Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None] fails
  • From: Syd Geraghty <sydgeraghty at mac.com>
  • Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 02:25:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200805190914.FAA12498@smc.vnet.net>

Hi Chris,

> Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None]


Works as advertised on my system. WinXP strikes again.

The deeper issue is why you want to use Framed when you also want to  
have no frame?

Syd

Syd Geraghty B.Sc, M.Sc.

sydgeraghty at mac.com

My System

Mathematica 6.0.2.1 for Mac OS X x86 (64 - bit) (March 13, 2008)
MacOS X V 10.5.2
MacBook Pro 2.33 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo  2GB RAM






On May 19, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Chris Osborn wrote:

> It seems that the option FrameStyle -> None to Framed does not work.
>
> Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None]
>
> returns a framed 3 with a black border around it in Mathematica
> version 6.0 on WinXP.
> The documentation states that, "The option setting FrameStyle->None
> draws no explicit frame. "
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>



  • Prev by Date: Re: FindRoot with a parameter
  • Next by Date: Re: Possible Bug Report: CoefficientList
  • Previous by thread: Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None] fails
  • Next by thread: Re: Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None] fails