[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None] fails

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg88875] Re: [mg88838] Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None] fails
• From: Syd Geraghty <sydgeraghty at mac.com>
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 02:25:58 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200805190914.FAA12498@smc.vnet.net>

Hi Chris,

> Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None]


Works as advertised on my system. WinXP strikes again.

The deeper issue is why you want to use Framed when you also want to  
have no frame?

Syd

Syd Geraghty B.Sc, M.Sc.

sydgeraghty at mac.com

My System

Mathematica 6.0.2.1 for Mac OS X x86 (64 - bit) (March 13, 2008)
MacOS X V 10.5.2
MacBook Pro 2.33 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo  2GB RAM






On May 19, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Chris Osborn wrote:

> It seems that the option FrameStyle -> None to Framed does not work.
>
> Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None]
>
> returns a framed 3 with a black border around it in Mathematica
> version 6.0 on WinXP.
> The documentation states that, "The option setting FrameStyle->None
> draws no explicit frame. "
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>

• References:
  • Framed[3, FrameStyle -> None] fails
    • From: Chris Osborn <chrisosb@gmail.com>