Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Re: Range of Use of Mathematica

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg89141] Re: [mg89128] Re: [mg89061] Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
  • From: "peter lindsay" <pl.0 at mac.com>
  • Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 07:12:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <g0m8tt$14$1@smc.vnet.net> <g0rkfr$dtv$1@smc.vnet.net>

I'm glad at least one other person seems to share my enthusiasm for the
printed word.Peter

2008/5/26 Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>:

> And this is one more place where well-conceived and well-executed
> introductory BOOKS about Mathematica 6, or applying Mathematatica 6 to
> specific subject areas, can help.
>
> So far, and so far as I am aware, we have only one instance of this:
> (1) Lynch's "Dynamical Systems with Applications using Mathematica", and
> (2) the additional Mathematica 6 notebooks to accompany Shaw's "Complex
> Analysis with Mathematica".
>
> Now if some of the old pre-version 6 books were updated or, preferably
> perhaps, new ones written, e.g., on:  calculus; differential equations;
> linear algebra; discrete math including combinatorics & graph theory.
> Even a new Glynn & Gray, "Beginner's Guide..."!
>
> My impression is that in (much) earlier Mathematica versions, WRI went
> out of its way to encourage and foster such 3rd party books (some of
> which were, in fact, written by or co-authored by insiders).  Either
> this is not being done or, if it is, there's a considerable lag in such
> efforts seeing the light of day.
>
> I remain convinced that some of the early success of Mathematica was the
> existence of such books, beyond the intrinsic value of the software
> itself.  And I continue to hope that the seemingly print-averse,
> pro-electronic enthusiasts within WRI do not totally dominate the
> direction this takes.
>
>
> David Bailey wrote:
>
> >  ...
> > My comments regarding the size of Mathematica related particularly to
> > the future. The problem is that a new user doesn't know, say, that for
> > his purpose he should concentrate on the kernel functions (he doesn't
> > even know what the kernel is) - he is presented with the totality, and
> > has to figure out how best to use the product. A potential user may get
> > no further than reading a review that presents Mathematica in a way that
> > seems to him to involve an excessive learning curve.
>
> --
> Murray Eisenberg                     murray at math.umass.edu
> Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
> Lederle Graduate Research Tower      phone 413 549-1020 (H)
> University of Massachusetts                413 545-2859 (W)
> 710 North Pleasant Street            fax   413 545-1801
> Amherst, MA 01003-9305
>
>


--



  • Prev by Date: Re: Integrate vs NIntegrate
  • Next by Date: Problems when i try to solve a system of equations
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Range of Use of Mathematica
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Re: Range of Use of Mathematica