MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Eliminating common factors?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg93334] Re: Eliminating common factors?
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:17:34 -0500 (EST)
  • Organization: Uni Leipzig
  • References: <gemjk2$4v5$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de

Hi,

4*(a/4 + b/(4*c)) // Cancel

??

Regards
   Jens

AES wrote:
> I have a simple, totally algebraic symbolic calculation that displays 
> its output in the form (rewritten here using TeX notation)
> 
>       4 ( {a \over 4 } + { b \over 4 c } )
> 
> where a, b and c are fairly simple products of purely algebraic 
> quantities; \over is the TeX notation for a display fraction; and the 
> curly brackets are just for TeX purposes and are not there in the actual 
> output.
> 
> Is there any Assumption for Simplify, or any other _simple_ way, to get 
> rid of those (utterly!!!) superfluous 4's?
> 
> [I suppose the real question is, why doesn't M cancel 'em the hell out 
> in the first place?!?!]
> 


  • Prev by Date: Re: Exporting graphics in PDF with fonts embedded
  • Next by Date: Re: Eliminating common factors?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Eliminating common factors?
  • Next by thread: Re: Eliminating common factors?