Re: Is there a simple way to transform 1.1 to 11/10?

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg92980] Re: Is there a simple way to transform 1.1 to 11/10?*From*: Alain Cochard <alain at geophysik.uni-muenchen.de>*Date*: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:36:28 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <gdkajv$4r2$1@smc.vnet.net>*Reply-to*: alain at geophysik.uni-muenchen.de

Szabolcs Horv=E1t writes: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 14:49, Alain Cochard > <alain at geophysik.uni-muenchen.de> wrote: > > Szabolcs Horvat writes: > > > Alain Cochard wrote: > > > > The obvious > > > > > > > > In[1]:= x=1.1`Infinity > > > > > > > > is not syntactically correct. > > > > > > > > I understand that SetPrecision[1.1,Infinity] does not work ei= ther: > > > > > > > > In[3]:= SetPrecision[1.1,Infinity] > > > > > > > > 2476979795053773 > > > > Out[3]= ---------------- > > > > 2251799813685248 > > > > > > > > In[4]:= N[%,20] > > > > > > > > Out[4]= 1.1000000000000000888 > > > > > > > > I searched the newsgroup and thought I had the solution with = Rationalize: > > > > > > > > In[5]:= Rationalize[1.1,0] > > > > > > > > 11 > > > > Out[5]= -- > > > > 10 > > > > > > > > But > > > > > > > > In[9]:= Rationalize[1.000000001,0] > > > > > > > > 999999918 > > > > Out[9]= --------- > > > > 999999917 > > > > > > > > In[10]:= N[%,20] > > > > > > > > Out[10]= 1.0000000010000000830 > > > > > > > > So any simple way=3F > > > > > > > > > > Hello Alain, > > > > > > Rationalize is the way to go. Floating point numbers are usual= ly stored > > > in a binary (not decimal) representation on computers. 1.00000= 0001 is > > > not exactly representable in binary (in the same way as 1/3 == > > > 0.3333333... is not exactly representable in decimal). Note th= at in > > > your example you start with a MachinePrecision number (approxim= ately 15 > > > digits), and then convert back to a number with 20 digits of pr= ecision. > > > If you start with 1.000000001`20 then everything will be fine= =2E > > > > > > In[1]:= Rationalize[1.000000001`20, 0] > > > Out[1]= 1000000001/1000000000 > > > > > > In[2]:= N[%, 20] > > > Out[2]= 1.0000000010000000000 > > > > > > Another example: > > > > > > In[1]:= Rationalize[N[Sqrt[2], 30], 0] > > > Out[1]= 1023286908188737/723573111879672 > > > > > > In[2]:= N[%, 30] > > > Out[2]= 1.41421356237309504880168872421 > > > > > > In[3]:= % - Sqrt[2] > > > Out[3]= 0.*10^-30 > > > > I don't really convert back to a number with 20 digits of precisio= n. > > You used N[%,20] in your example where % was the rationalization of = a > MachinePrecision number. If you convert it back to a MachinePrecisi= on > number (simply N[%]), then you'll get the same number that you start= ed > with, and not a different one. > > > It was just to convince myself that it was not 1000000001/10000000= 00 > > Actually 1.000000001 isn't 1000000001/1000000000 either ... see belo= w. > > > The solution you give will not be fully general (as that by bob) s= ince > > you have to adapt the '20' or the '30' for each case. This is a b= it > > painful for a given number and impossible to do in a program, it s= eems > > to me. > > > > No, you misunderstood me. I did not offer a solution. I just tried= > to explain why the result returned by Rationalize[1.000000001,0] is > correct, and why the "problem" does not exist at all. Sorry that I misundertood you. Also, I wasn't implying the Mathematica does not give the correct result. There is a problem for me because when I play with mathematical numbers like 1.608910743981704391 with an infinite number of zeroes afterwards, it is painful to manually count the figures and write it as 1608910743981704391/1000000000000000000 > You asked how you can transform 1.1 to 11/10. This is not a > precisely defined question. Why do you prefer 11/10=3F Why not > 1100000000000000088/1000000000000000000, for example=3F Because I'd say that for pure mathematics, 11/10 is closer to 1.1 than 1100000000000000088/1000000000000000000 is... > > [...] > > What I meant was that you have to decide what precision to use. [...] I want infinite precision, juste like when you enter 1, Pi, or 11/10.

**Re: my Mathematica file was corrupted ! help !**

**Re: A Dynamic mess**

**Re: Is there a simple way to transform 1.1 to 11/10?**

**Re: Is it possible to reverse "Color Schames" function ?**