|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: notation using # with exponents and &
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg93115] Re: notation using # with exponents and &
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:12:05 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: Stanford University
- References: <gdevcc$3mp$1@smc.vnet.net> <gdhqdk$2ir$1@smc.vnet.net>
In article <gdhqdk$2ir$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com> wrote:
> A pure function (or anonymous function in some other programming
> languages)
"Anonymous function" might in fact seem to be a more meaningful name for
the Mathematic construct, especially since what Mathematica refers to as
a "pure function" seems to be significantly different from what
Wikipedia refers to as a "pure function" in mathematics.
Or am I misunderstanding the Wikipedia description? (I have no prior
experience with either of these concepts.)
Prev by Date:
Re: mathlink and complex number
Next by Date:
Re: How to plot a variable
Previous by thread:
Re: notation using # with exponents and &
Next by thread:
Re: notation using # with exponents and &
|