Re: Is there a simple way to transform 1.1 to 11/10

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg93125] Re: Is there a simple way to transform 1.1 to 11/10*From*: Alain Cochard <alain at geophysik.uni-muenchen.de>*Date*: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:14:02 -0500 (EST)*Organization*: Universites Paris VI/Paris VII - France*References*: <200810240629.CAA22968@smc.vnet.net> <6ED845A5-F77F-42AE-A3EF-E8A15F2DCA10@mimuw.edu.pl> <18689.46568.972349.540344@frac.u-strasbg.fr> <8C37CE0B-6BE6-47CE-B698-8363ABF27BF4@mimuw.edu.pl> <0061C0C7-4D40-4D33-964A-81FBB338A52A@mimuw.edu.pl> <730D4D3D-4AA2-41A7-9E21-DA23A0694D7A@mimuw.edu.pl> <18689.54940.101.812951@frac.u-strasbg.fr> <gdug9p$jp0$1@smc.vnet.net>

Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> writes: >> Andrzej Kozlowski writes: >> >>> One more (I hope final) remark. Another, perhaps simpler way, is to >>> include just one extra zero (that should not be very hard): >> >> If you are talking about inputs, I agree; in this case it appears to >> me similar to inputting strings. > > I meant input. I do not really understand what you are doing and why > writing 1.00000000000000010 is much harder than writing > 1.0000000000000001. No, it is not. I just wanted to be sure you were talking about input. I'll prefer the string approach since I can see by myself why it will never fail. I need to think more about the case of numbers coming out from Mathematica computations. So I consider my initial problem --that of inputs-- solved, and I warmly thank everybody. > Is this entire discussion motivated by your desire to avoid pressing > keys on your keyboard? That's one way to put it. I'd rather say that I like elegant solutions. Anyway, transforming a lot of such numbers is error prone and way too time consuming, to the extent that it simply cannot be done. a.

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: Is there a simple way to transform 1.1 to 11/10***From:*Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>

**References**:**Re: Is there a simple way to transform 1.1 to***From:*Alain Cochard <alain@geophysik.uni-muenchen.de>