Re: ImageResolution
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg98248] Re: ImageResolution
- From: PJW <Patrick.John.Wheeler at gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:39:09 -0500 (EST)
- References: <28755811.1237631721904.JavaMail.root@m02> <gq5561$86t$1@smc.vnet.net>
I wanted to thank David Park, and the other people who emailed me, for
taking the time to help me discover the root of my problem and to
explain the problem that I was having and what I used as a solution.
The Problem:
OS: Mac OS 10.5.6
Mathematica 7.0.0
Increasing the ImageResolution option in the Rasterize function also
increased the white space between the FrameLabels and the frame.
The solution update to Mathematica 7.0.1 which fixed the problem.
On Mar 22, 5:50 am, "David Park" <djmp... at comcast.net> wrote:
> If you don't like the default ImageMargins, then why not specify them
> explicitly?
>
> GraphicsColumn[
> Table[Rasterize[ListPlot[Table[x, {x, -10, 10}], Frame -> True,
> FrameLabel -> {"Not quite", "Hi"},
> ImageMargins -> {{15, 10}, {15, 10}}],
> ImageResolution-> ir], {ir, {10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500}}]]
>
> David Park
> djmp... at comcast.nethttp://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/
>
> From: pjw [mailto:Patrick.John.Whee... at gmail.com]
>
> I want to output some high resolution graphs, however changingImageResolu=
tionseems to effect the padding around the Frame label.
> Does anyone know or have a solution for this?
>
> The code below demonstrates this problem:
>
> GraphicsColumn[
> Table[Rasterize[
> ListPlot[Table[x, {x, -10, 10}], Frame -> True,
> FrameLabel -> {"Not quite", "Hi"}],
> ImageResolution-> ir], {ir, {10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500}}]]