Re: Re: Can't figure out how to export Mathematica into Word
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg98285] Re: [mg98238] Re: Can't figure out how to export Mathematica into Word
- From: John Fultz <jfultz at wolfram.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 20:15:18 -0500 (EST)
- Reply-to: jfultz at wolfram.com
Since no fewer than three people pointed this out, I just wanted to make sure
that people know that, as of 7.0.1, regular copy/paste uses MathML automatically
when appropriate (i.e. when copying either a single typesetting cell, in part or
in whole, that contains math or code, but no graphics). So, it will generally
be the case that using Copy As is not required.
Sincerely,
John Fultz
jfultz at wolfram.com
User Interface Group
Wolfram Research, Inc.
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 04:37:16 -0500 (EST), Sjoerd C. de Vries wrote:
> If you have Word 2007 you can copy the equation as MathML and paste it
> straight in Word. It is editable in Word's equation editor.
>
> Otherwise, try a copy as picture.
>
> Cheers -- Sjoerd
>
>
> On Apr 2, 11:48=C2 am, neojunkox <sungreenta... at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I help out my lab partners in one of my classes by exporting out the
>> data=
> and equations we worked on from mathematica. They use microsoft word so I
> =
> need to copy or export things into rtf first or copy things directly into
> m=
> icrosoft word. The problem is that many symbols come out strangely when I
> t=
> ry to export or even copy them the tables and math notation comes out
> like =
> ---
>> =C2 =C2 {\[Null], "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(F\), \(1\)]\)", "\!\(\*Subsc=
> riptBox[\(d\), \(1\)]\)", "\!\(\*SubscriptBox[\(=EF=81=B4\), \(1\)]\)",
> "\!=
> \(\*SubscriptBox[\(F\), \(2\)]\)",
>
>> It seems like there is something not set up the way I want to in the
>> expo=
> rt or copy functions... Also, when exporting to rtf, the tables come out
> as=
> a list of data instead of being in the correct form. Another system used
> t=
> o export this stuff out to rtf correctly by default... How do I set up
> math=
> ematica to do the same?