[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Scaling JPEGs or TIFFs inside PDF slides (using Illustrator)?
I often place JPEG or TIFF images (color or B&W) into PDF files, then add or edit title lines, text annotations, arrows, and the like in vector format using Illustrator 11, in order to make PDF slides for projection. This has proven to be a very convenient technique for me to organize and repurpose graphics for presentation -- especially if I start out by cataloging all the slides, or potential slides, that I may want for a certain presentation into an iView MediaPro catalog specifically for that presentation; and then use the very convenient tools and interface in IVMP to organize and manage the presentation, as well as to open the individual slides in Acrobat and Illustrator, edit them or touch them up, and save them back into the presentation. The primary purpose of this note is to ask a minor technical question about that process. That is, sometimes I want to rescale an image in a slide up or down in size by, say, 10 or 20 percent. One way is to go back to the original JPEG or TIFF, make a resized copy of the image in Photoshop Elements, and then replace it in the PDF. An alternative is to rescale the image directly in the PDF document using Illustrator -- and my experience is that Illustrator does an extremely good job of doing this kind of rescaling, even on nasty things like scanned images of B&W printed documents. (They may not look so good when viewed in Illustrator -- but they look extremely good after being saved back to PDF and opened in Acrobat.) My question for the PDF profis here is: When I do this rescaling of a raster image within a PDF document, using Illustrator, is Illustrator actually building a complete new (rescaled) raster image inside the PDF document, and keeping it in the PDF along with the originally placed version? Or does it just keep the rescaled version and discard the original one? Or does it just insert a brief command for the image to be rescaled "on the fly" any time the PDF is projected or printed? Thanks for any info and assistance. ------------- [And as an addendum, I'm copying this post to cssmm frankly to tweak some of the people who argue that all presentations in the future should and must be done directly from Mathematica notebooks and nothing else (and, secondarily, that _all_ of the capabilities I've mentioned above should and must be built into and carried out from one single, massive, eventually un-learnable and un-documentable Mathematica application. I have no objection at all to making presentations direct from a live Mathematica notebook in situations for example where this might be a not too lengthy, single-topic or one-shot discussion, maybe in a class or group meeting or informal situation, of material that can be covered from a single Mathematica notebook. That makes total sense. But suppose you have a collection of literally many hundreds if not thousands of slides and graphics, some generated by Mathematica, others collected from all over the place, over many years; and you're continually re-organizing and re-purposing and revising these (or copies of them), for presentations at different levels, to different audiences, or in different formats, on screen, in reports, in papers, in books. Suppose, as would be the case if you insisted on the "Mathematica notebook only" approach, that these materials may have come from many dozens of different Mathematica notebooks, assembled over a dozen plus years, in a half-dozen successive versions of Mathematica (so that some of these notebooks will not even execute any more; and those that still do are likely produce different results than they originally did). So, to do this repurposing, or assembling a new presentation from a lot of varied existing sources, you're going to try to pull out and reassemble bits and pieces from these dozens of notebooks, into a new notebook for your upcoming presentation? And debug that? And then, every time you want to make even some small but significant change in one or a few slides in a many megabyte notebook, you have to re-edit and re-run it? Insane!! In the approach I'm suggesting, and using, any time I want to add a live or interactive demo as one part of a presentation -- and I've been programming interactive onscreen demos for teaching, for research, for professional presentations, and for my own education, using multiple computer tools, since the late 1980s -- it's trivially easy to just add a link to that Mathematica demo or animation (or Flash or QuickTime or whatever material) from within the PDF (or PowerPoint, or Keynote, or whatever) presentation or online document. Mathematica has long been a truly great (even "insanely great") tool, and still is. But a lot of what it's currently doing as regards its overall approach, documentation, and interface, strikes me as just plain insane. -----------------  For a 1991 invited presentation and article I prepared on this topic of this post (and which I think is still pretty good nearly two decades later), you can take a look at the link below. Those of you too junior to recall Apple's "Knowledge Navigator" buzz-phrase, or MIT's "Athena Experiment", or the concept of the "3M-3K" computer, may find it interesting. <http://www.stanford.edu/~siegman/computer_display_tools_spie_1991.pdf> [also at <https://www.spie.org/etop/1991/338_1.pdf>]