Re: Installation Problem with Mathematica 4.2 under Windows XP
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg98846] Re: Installation Problem with Mathematica 4.2 under Windows XP
- From: Yves Klett <yves.klett at googlemail.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 05:46:32 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <gsh1ck$ti$1@smc.vnet.net>
Dr. Kragler, I am not sure if this is relevant, but I seem to hazily recall a somewhat similar message when I installed some version without sufficient administrator privileges and/or from a non-admin account in XP. Perhaps worth a check... Regards, Yves Dr. Robert Kragler schrieb: > Hi, > > because TechSupport of WRI (who would be primary addressee) does not > respond to my inquiry I redirect my question to MathGroup hoping that > someone may have come across the same problem and knows a work-around. > > On my laptop where I have (only) recently upgraded the operating system > from Windowxs 2000 to XP Professional 2002 SP3 I want to reinstall > Mathematica V 4.2.1 (besides other versions 3.0., 5.2, 6.0 and 7.0) in > order to compare the sometimes different behavior of various versions of > Mathematica with respect to specific procedures / packages e.g. Limit etc. > > Under Windows 2000 there was no problem installing previous versions of > Mathematica (e.g. 3.0, 4.2, 5.2, 6.0 and 7.0) > whereas with Windows XP there occurs an installation problem with > Mathematica V 4.2.1 ONLY (not with the much older version 3.0 from 1998 > !). The corresponding MathInstaller (08/2002) for version 4.2.1 starts > a wizard but after about 18% the following message appears : > > "MathInstaller is unable to run a program needed to proceed with the > installation. Restart your system and try again" ErroR 105. > When I press the OK button then in an "Application Error" window the > following message is displayed : > "ISSET_SE caused a general protection fault in module <unknown> ..." > > Does anyone know what to do in order to enforce the installation of > Mathematica 4.2.1 under Windows XP Professional. (As emphasized above, > no problem under OS Windows 2000 ) > > Thank you for any advice. > Robert Kragler >