       Re: Re: Creating a Random Function to Select an Irrational

On 3 Aug 2009, at 18:45, BenT wrote:

>  Although I am not
> interested in cryptograpy or statistic probabilities for which
> "random" numbers are typically used, if not "relied" on, my biggest
> concern, that your use of WorkingPrecision partly addresses, is the
> prevention of repeating digits within the "random" value which would
> imply some sort of "rationality" to the number.

Of course you can get any number of repeated digits in a finite
expansion of an irrational number. Look for example at the last 6
digits of this:

N[Pi, 768]

(actually, these last digits should all be 9, as you see by looking at
N[Pi, 769]].

If you go long enough you will find a repeating sequence of any length
(to get 7 successive repeated digits you need to take a total of
710107 digits of Pi).

Thus, there is no advantage in using finite expansions of symbolic
irrationals over using RandomReal with high WorkingPrecision.

Andrzej Kozlowski

• Prev by Date: Why use OptionsPattern, OptionsValue ?
• Next by Date: Re: Multiplication of matrices
• Previous by thread: Re: Creating a Random Function to Select an Irrational
• Next by thread: Re: Creating a Random Function to Select an Irrational