[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: ListContourPlot3D bug?

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg102384] Re: ListContourPlot3D bug?
• From: markus <markusg.phys at googlemail.com>
• Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200908040827.EAA26802@smc.vnet.net> <h5ebct$1ks$1@smc.vnet.net>

yes, it gives what I expect in this case. But my point was that when I
plot scalar- or vector-fields, e.g in 2D, I would just expect the 1st
list-level to belong to the x-axis, and the 2nd level to the y-axis.
But the behavior of the ListPlot functions is obviously different by
design: they format things in a matrix kind of way (first index gives
the row, second the column).
I wasted a lot of time figuring out why to the data produced by my
simulation (plotted by ListContourPlot3D) does not correspond to the
analytical results (plotted by ContourPlot3D).

• References:
  • ListContourPlot3D bug?
    • From: markus <markusg.phys@googlemail.com>