Re: ListContourPlot3D bug?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg102384] Re: ListContourPlot3D bug?
- From: markus <markusg.phys at googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200908040827.EAA26802@smc.vnet.net> <h5ebct$1ks$1@smc.vnet.net>
yes, it gives what I expect in this case. But my point was that when I plot scalar- or vector-fields, e.g in 2D, I would just expect the 1st list-level to belong to the x-axis, and the 2nd level to the y-axis. But the behavior of the ListPlot functions is obviously different by design: they format things in a matrix kind of way (first index gives the row, second the column). I wasted a lot of time figuring out why to the data produced by my simulation (plotted by ListContourPlot3D) does not correspond to the analytical results (plotted by ContourPlot3D).
- References:
- ListContourPlot3D bug?
- From: markus <markusg.phys@googlemail.com>
- ListContourPlot3D bug?