MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: ListContourPlot3D bug?

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg102384] Re: ListContourPlot3D bug?
  • From: markus <markusg.phys at>
  • Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 05:31:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <> <h5ebct$1ks$>

yes, it gives what I expect in this case. But my point was that when I
plot scalar- or vector-fields, e.g in 2D, I would just expect the 1st
list-level to belong to the x-axis, and the 2nd level to the y-axis.
But the behavior of the ListPlot functions is obviously different by
design: they format things in a matrix kind of way (first index gives
the row, second the column).
I wasted a lot of time figuring out why to the data produced by my
simulation (plotted by ListContourPlot3D) does not correspond to the
analytical results (plotted by ContourPlot3D).

  • Prev by Date: video on Presentations by Williams and Park
  • Next by Date: Re: Making your own Definitions using Operators without built in
  • Previous by thread: Re: ListContourPlot3D bug?
  • Next by thread: Re: ListContourPlot3D bug?