[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]
Re: Viewing packages in mathematica
In article <h6tv7b$drf$1 at smc.vnet.net>, "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net> wrote: > > So that is what happens with Mathematica. One wants to work on math, or on > some technical project, but one is always sucked down into a morass of > undocumented features, and computer science, and guessing. One spends 95% of > one's time working on Mathematica problems and 5% actually doing something > interesting! > My God, David! It seems to me you have suddenly started to sound exactly like me, before I more or less gave up on posting on these issues and tried to get refocused on "actually doing something interesting" myself. Let me just say again: I believe the core lesson in this saga -- or to phrase it differently, the core cause of this disaster -- is the attempt (one might say, if one wanted to be nasty about it, the megalomaniacal attempt) to have one single massive app that will be all things, provide all tools and capabilities, to all users, rather than some kind of much more modular approach. Can't be done, has never been done in this field. Causes all kinds of problems, which get increasingly unsolvable as the basic system gets larger and expands out of control; ultimately suppresses creative innovation rather than enabling it. Very sad, especially given the massive talent, massive accomplishments, and massive innovations that have now gotten so entrapped in the congealing molasses of Mathematica.