Re: bug in RandomChoice if weight is zero?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg106027] Re: [mg105976] bug in RandomChoice if weight is zero?
- From: Leonid Shifrin <lshifr at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:17:21 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200912290617.BAA02582@smc.vnet.net>
Hi Matthias,
presumably this is because RandomSample never samples any given element more
than once - in that case it has no other choice, regardless of the weight.
Perhaps, the error message might be added for exact symbolic zero appearing
somewhere in the wieights for the case where the size of the desired sample
is larger than the number of non-zero weights (non-zero means
UnsameQ[weight,0]). It is not clear however whether it is worth it given
the overhead of such an analysis. Besides, this will be a point solution
anyway, since some expressions that might be used for weights may be in fact
identically equal to zero but just not simplified to zero - these cases
would not be caught by such an analysis.
OTOH, it is hard to make a formal (not based on syntax) distinction between
zero and some very small weight close to zero (which may be expressed not
necessarily with machine precision). This of course depends on the
implementation of the underlying algorithm used to do the sampling - whether
or not it treats weights smaller than machine epsilon as zero. From the
point of view of the abstract interface of RandomSample, there is no reason
why it should do that, even if such events are highly unlikely to be
sampled.
Generally, what you ask for should be possible once you give a specific
interpretation of what you mean by zero, but arguably this would add more
ambiguities/restrictions than it is worth for a kind of a general-purpose
function that RandomSample is. After all, you can always wrap RandomSample
in your own wrapper function which will implement this functionality in the
way you want it (consistent with your definition of zero), while preserving
the syntax of the original RandomSample.
Regards,
Leonid
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Matthias Greiff <greiff at mac.com> wrote:
> If I use RandomChoice with weights of zero the corresponding elements will
> never be selected.
>
> In[62]:= RandomChoice[{0, 0, 3} -> {3, 2, 1}, 5]
> Out[62]= {1, 1, 1, 1, 1}
>
> Why is it not the same if I use RandomSample?
> The following command
>
> RandomSample[{1, 2, 0} -> Range[3], 2]
>
> returns either {1,2} or {2,1}. But when I change the command to sample size
> 3 I get the following.
>
> In[60]:= RandomSample[{1, 2, 0} -> Range[3], 3]
> Out[60]= {2, 1, 3}
>
> Why is the third element selected? Shouldn't Mathematica return an error
> message because the sample size is larger than the population size?
>
> Appreciate your answers.
>
> Merry Christmas!
>
> Matthias
>
>
- References:
- bug in RandomChoice if weight is zero?
- From: Matthias Greiff <greiff@mac.com>
- bug in RandomChoice if weight is zero?