Re: Re: Re: Re: Replace and
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg106072] Re: [mg106029] Re: [mg105980] Re: [mg105968] Re: Replace and
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:20:44 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200912270006.TAA12080@smc.vnet.net> <hh72dp$kud$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at yahoo.com
Well... I was (and am) of two minds on the issue. I posted the opinion that treatment of this could be better, and I posted the opinion (fact) that -1. is an atomic object, so it has no sub-parts (such as 1.). Truly, some issues have been argued to death. But not everyone was here to see that, and I see no harm in discussing them again, from time to time. Nobody's forcing anyone to participate. Bobby On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 03:23:31 -0600, Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > What I find kind of impressive is that there are people who find it > amusing to keep posting essentially the same posts for about two decades > and this despite the fact that they are being completely ignored by the > developers (and there is no reason to think that anything will ever > change in this respect). Masochism? > > I try to move with the times so what concerns me is that my Front End is > crashing too often. > > Andrzej Kozlowski > > > > On 29 Dec 2009, at 15:18, DrMajorBob wrote: > >> True enough, I'd say. >> >> Bobby >> >> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:57:38 -0600, Richard Fateman >> <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: >> >>> Scot T. Martin wrote: >>>> The problem is that "-1." is not "1". >>> >>> And furthermore, this bug has been declared a feature. And defended, >>> repeatedly. Just as I does not occur in -I. >>> It can be fixed, should be fixed, and has been fixed in other CAS. >>> >> >> >> -- >> DrMajorBob at yahoo.com >> > > -- DrMajorBob at yahoo.com
- References:
- Replace and ReplaceAll -- simple application
- From: amannuc1 <Anthony.J.Mannucci@jpl.nasa.gov>
- Replace and ReplaceAll -- simple application