MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: (2/3)[[1]]


On Feb 12, 2009, at 6:33 AM, obott0 at gmail.com wrote:

> I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but why can't Part be used
> with Rational?
>
> i.e. (2/3)[[1]]

Because Rational is Atomic, it's the same reason Part doesn't work  
with Complex.


  • Prev by Date: Re: (2/3)[[1]]
  • Next by Date: Re: NDSolve and step-size control
  • Previous by thread: (2/3)[[1]]
  • Next by thread: Re: (2/3)[[1]]