[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Functions inside modules with external definitions
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg96519] Re: Functions inside modules with external definitions
*From*: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
*Date*: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 03:22:29 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <gn5ugm$h02$1@smc.vnet.net>
E. Martin-Serrano wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please review the following and see weather my question has and deserves an
> answer. It is a about defining functions local to modules but using external
> definitions of the right hand side of the local function and passed as
> parameters to the module.
>
>
>
>
>
> expression = a x ^c + b y ^(1-c) (* or whatever expression *)
>
>
>
> Clear[f];
>
>
>
> f[x_: x,y_: y][a_: a,b_: b,c_: c]:=Evaluate@expression
>
>
>
> ?f
>
> f[k1,k2][.2,.3,.4]
>
>
>
> (* Functions inside modules where the RHS of the function has been assigned
> to a variable *)
>
> (* first form works as I expected, but uses an extrenal definition for a
> local function (the name is local) *)
>
>
>
> m1=
>
> Module[{f},
>
> f[x_: x,y_: y][a_ :a,b_: b,c_: c]:=Evaluate@expression;
>
> f[k1,k2][.2,.3,.4]
>
> ]
>
>
>
> (* second form. I expected it worked as the one above but it does not; the
> expression formed outside is assigned to a local variable with the same name
> *)
>
>
>
> m2 =
>
> Module[{f, expression = expression},
>
> f[x_: x, y_: y][a_ :a,b_: b,c_: c]:=Evaluate@expression;
>
> f[k1,k2][.2,.3,.4]
>
> ]
>
>
>
> (* third form. I expected it worked as the first one above but it does not;
> the expression is assigned directly to a local variable *)
>
>
>
> m3 =
>
> Module[{f,expression = a x ^c + b y ^(1-c)},
>
> f[x_: x,y_: y][a_ :a,b_: b,c_: c]:=Evaluate@expression;
>
> f[k1,k2][.2,.3,.4]
>
> ]
>
>
>
> (* fourth form. I expected it worked as the first one above but it does not;
> the expression is assigned within the body of the module o a local variable
> *)
>
>
>
> m4 =
>
> Module[{f,expr},
>
> expr =expression;
>
> f[x_: x,y_: y][a_ :a,b_: b,c_: c]:=Evaluate@expr;
>
> f[k1,k2][.2,.3,.4]
>
> ]
>
>
>
> (* My question is how to construct a function inside a module in manner
> similar to the following *)
>
>
>
> expression = a x ^c + b y ^(1-c);
>
> mx =
>
> Module[{f,expression = expression},
>
> f[x_: x,y_: y][a_ :a,b_: b,c_: c]:=Evaluate@expression;
>
> f[k1,k2][.2,.3,.4]
>
> ]
>
>
>
> (* and working as the following works *)
>
>
>
> m1=
>
> Module[{f},
>
> f[x_: x,y_: y][a_ :a,b_: b,c_: c]:=Evaluate@expression;
>
> f[k1,k2][.2,.3,.4]
>
> ]
>
>
>
> Many thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> E. martin-Serrano
>
>
Evaluate is irrelevant to your problem - which is that you need to
replace the variables in your expression.
I would use a different symbol for the pattern variables:
g[xx_: x,yy_: y]:=(expression/.{x->xx,y->yy});
I am not sure why you require to define 'f' in such a complex way. There
may be easier ways to solve your underlying problem - I suggest you
describe what it is you want to do.
David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk
Prev by Date:
**Re: newbie here,, need help with parametrics**
Next by Date:
**Re: Functions inside modules with external definitions**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Functions inside modules with external definitions**
Next by thread:
**Re: Functions inside modules with external definitions**
| |