- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg96535] Re: (2/3)[]
- From: Albert Retey <awnl at gmx-topmail.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:54:23 -0500 (EST)
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <200902130841.DAA26517@smc.vnet.net> <email@example.com>
> Further, in the documentation page for Part, there is no explicit
> statement that something for which AtomQ returns True does not have
> parts. Still Further, the documentation for AtomQ says that AtomQ[expr]
> yields True if expr is an expression which cannot be divided into
If one understands 'a part of an expression' and 'subexpression' as the
same thing, I would understand the last part of the second sentence to
be just another formulation of the last part of the first.
> The situation begs for clarification!
Maybe the documentation could be improved, so it doesn't use too many
Mathematica specific words which are not clearly defined...
Prev by Date:
Re: Length of a held expression
Next by Date:
Re: Laplace Transform Exponential Shift
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: (2/3)[]
Next by thread: