Re: (2/3)[[1]]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg96535] Re: (2/3)[[1]]
- From: Albert Retey <awnl at gmx-topmail.de>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:54:23 -0500 (EST)
- References: <gn11e8$7vn$1@smc.vnet.net> <200902130841.DAA26517@smc.vnet.net> <gn5u9r$gpu$1@smc.vnet.net>
Hi, > Further, in the documentation page for Part, there is no explicit > statement that something for which AtomQ returns True does not have > parts. Still Further, the documentation for AtomQ says that AtomQ[expr] > yields True if expr is an expression which cannot be divided into > subexpressions; If one understands 'a part of an expression' and 'subexpression' as the same thing, I would understand the last part of the second sentence to be just another formulation of the last part of the first. > The situation begs for clarification! Maybe the documentation could be improved, so it doesn't use too many Mathematica specific words which are not clearly defined... hth, albert
- References:
- Re: (2/3)[[1]]
- From: David Bailey <dave@removedbailey.co.uk>
- Re: (2/3)[[1]]