|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Hash function of strings
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg95066] Re: Hash function of strings
- From: Joseph Gwinn <joegwinn at comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 03:27:38 -0500 (EST)
- References: <gjng6s$2ls$1@smc.vnet.net> <gjqa2r$3aa$1@smc.vnet.net>
In article <gjqa2r$3aa$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
"Sjoerd C. de Vries" <sjoerd.c.devries at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think it's possible. Hash works on Mathematica expressions and
> there is no way that a string expression can be converted to an
> expression consisting of its binary equivalent only. If there would be
> a structure "binary sequence" or so, it must have a Head in
> Mathematica designating it as such and then we're back at something
> like the string problem.
>
> Cheers --Sjoerd
>
> On Jan 3, 12:55 pm, Nacho <ncc1701... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all.
> >
> > I'm trying to calculate the MD5 Hash function of a series of strings
> > and I'm getting different results from the "true" MD5.
> >
> > I have searched the group and I have found that the Hash[] function is
> > including the " " of the strings. A solution is proposed, creating a
> > temporary file and then using FileHash.
> >
> > My problem is that I want to calculate the Hash of about one million
> > strings, so creating temporary files is impossible.
> >
> > Can you think in a method to calculate the Hash very quickly, without
> > the " "?
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
A million hashes? Performance will also be an issue.
Use MathLink to access one of the standard C-coded MD5 functions via
some C glue code that will strip the quotes, et al.
Joe Gwinn
Prev by Date:
Re: Graph of some built-in functions blows up Mathematica V7
Next by Date:
Re: Re: Locators with complete graph, Kn
Previous by thread:
Re: Changing default meaning of ImageSize -> Automatic
Next by thread:
Re: Module and call or others
|