MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Weirdness from double integrals?

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg95755] Re: Weirdness from double integrals?
  • From: Erik Max Francis <max at>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:02:56 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <> <glj8e1$doa$>

danl at wrote:

> There are many subtleties to this. First, if you do an explicit multiple
> integral (that is, using ont Integrate rather than iterating several of
> them), then the GenerateConditions option is only used for the last
> integration. This is documented but certainly constitutes "fine print".
> For the GenerateConditions->False behavior of prior integrals, it is
> common that they might give a spurious zero due to splitting ranges and
> making conflicting hidden assumptions on parameters that cause results to
> be not everywhere applicable.
> One possible way around might be to set GenerateConditions->True so that
> it will be in effect for all levels of the integration.
> Integrate[integrand[[3]], {x, -x0, x0}, {y, -y0, y0},
>  GenerateConditions -> True]
> Problem now is Mathematica 7 claims this diverges. I need to look into
> this more closely, but offhand I have to say this looks like a bug in
> convergence testing.

Okay, so there _is_ something goofy going on here.

> As you have found, best is to give applicable assumptions. This variant
> gives a useful result.

I've verified this works.  Thanks.

Erik Max Francis && max at &&
  San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
   Only love is worth the risk
    -- Oleta Adams

  • Prev by Date: Re: mathematica's syntax is very like lisp language
  • Next by Date: Partial derviatives in mathematica
  • Previous by thread: Re: Weirdness from double integrals?
  • Next by thread: Re: Weirdness from double integrals?