Re: Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg101383] Re: [mg101375] Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 06:42:44 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <30723579.1246246649561.JavaMail.root@n11>
- Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com
> Just for the record, I don't share the sentiment voiced in this post. Nor do I. With or without Presentations, Mr. Park knows more about Mathematica graphics -- and informative graphics in general -- than the lot of us. Bobby On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 04:39:43 -0500, AES <siegman at stanford.edu> wrote: > In article <h2i4mb$91r$1 at smc.vnet.net>, > Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalvarez at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 1, 7:34 am, "David Park" <djmp... at comcast.net> wrote: >> > The "AxesInFront" and "GridLinesInFront" options should be documented >> in >> > Graphics. But should they be documented in every 2D plot type? That's >> > probably a lot of work. It's one of the disadvantages of organizing >> the >> > graphics around set-piece plot types. >> > >> > David Park >> >> Do you have to turn every one of your posts into an advertisment? :/ >> >> -- m > > Just for the record, I don't share the sentiment voiced in this post. > -- DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>
- Re: Re: Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?