Re: Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg101394] Re: [mg101375] Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 06:44:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Mathematics & Statistics, Univ. of Mass./Amherst
- References: <30723579.1246246649561.JavaMail.root@n11> <200906301035.GAA10724@smc.vnet.net> <h2i4mb$91r$1@smc.vnet.net> <200907030939.FAA19319@smc.vnet.net>
- Reply-to: murray at math.umass.edu
Ditto! With David Park, I often find awkward the built-in graphics paradigm that requires an Epilog, Prolog, or other circumlocution in order to combine graphics with a Plot, etc. It would obviously be inadvisable to replace outright that built-in structure with the structure provided by Park's Presentations package. But it would be nice to have the latter available in the kernel as an alternative -- or at the very least as a package shipped with Mathematica. AES wrote: > In article <h2i4mb$91r$1 at smc.vnet.net>, > Mariano Su=E1rez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalvarez at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Jul 1, 7:34 am, "David Park" <djmp... at comcast.net> wrote: >>> The "AxesInFront" and "GridLinesInFront" options should be documented= in >>> Graphics. But should they be documented in every 2D plot type? That's= >>> probably a lot of work. It's one of the disadvantages of organizing t= he >>> graphics around set-piece plot types. >>> >>> David Park >> Do you have to turn every one of your posts into an advertisment? :/ >> >> -- m > > Just for the record, I don't share the sentiment voiced in this post. > -- Murray Eisenberg murray at math.umass.edu Mathematics & Statistics Dept. Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H) University of Massachusetts 413 545-2859 (W) 710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801 Amherst, MA 01003-9305
- References:
- Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?
- From: AES <siegman@stanford.edu>
- Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods exist?