Re: Refine, assumptions, domains
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg101715] Re: Refine, assumptions, domains
- From: Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:08:57 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <h3hjkc$1ue$1@smc.vnet.net> <h3hqqr$5l3$1@smc.vnet.net>
Jon McLoone wrote: > How about... > > n Pi /. {ToRules[Reduce[0 < n*Pi < 10 && Element[n, Integers], n]]} > > On Jul 14, 10:37 am, Richard Fateman <fate... at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: >> What I'm looking for is a simple way to obtain a finite list >> >> { Pi, 2 Pi, 3 Pi} >> >> from this information: >> >> 0< n*Pi < 10, Element[n,Integers] >> >> Refine doesn't do this, at least with Mathematica 6.0 >> Suggestions? (cc to fate... at gmail.com would be nice.) > > Thanks for the suggestions! What I really wanted was a way of finding the solutions of any equation, say Sin[x]==0 that lie in a particular range, say the range 0 to 10. Naturally, I prefer that this be done symbolically and exactly rather than numerically, when possible. If we try Reduce[Sin[x]==0,x]. After replacing the dummy name C[1] by n, the answer condition is Element[n, Integers] && (x == 2*n*Pi || x == Pi + 2*n*Pi) which is correct but clumsy. Automatically mapping this into Jon's construction, is hairier. If we can manage to get this... (2 n Pi || Pi + 2 n Pi) /. {ToRules[ Reduce[((0 < 2*n*Pi < 10) || (0 < Pi + 2*n*Pi < 10)) && Element[n, Integers], n]]} The answer comes out {0 || Pi, 2*Pi || 3*Pi} which is pretty close; % /. Or->List //Flatten does the rest, given that particular form. Thanks.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Refine, assumptions, domains
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski@gmail.com>
- Re: Re: Refine, assumptions, domains