Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: problem writing debugging utility function

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg100348] Re: [mg100248] problem writing debugging utility function
  • From: DrMajorBob <btreat1 at austin.rr.com>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:11:25 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200905300057.UAA23426@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: drmajorbob at bigfoot.com

SetAttributes[echo, HoldFirst]

echo[x_] := Print[ToString@HoldForm@x, " = ", x]

Bobby

On Fri, 29 May 2009 19:57:49 -0500, dabrowsa at indiana.edu  
<dabrowsa at indiana.edu> wrote:

> This matter is pretty unimportant, but perhaps of interest in laying
> out a persistent source confusion for me with Mathematica: evaluation
> control.
>
> I'm skeptical of the built-in debugger because it seems to crash the
> kernel often, so I do most of my debugging by inserting print
> statements like
>
>     Print["variableOne = ",variableOne].
>
> Being extraordinarily lazy I soon thought it might be nice to have a
> little function, say dbgv, which takes a variable or name of a
> variable as an argument, and produces the same result as the print
> statement above.
>
> At first I assumed this would be easy, since almost every programming
> problem turns out to be pretty easy with Mathematica.  But after an hour
> or so I began to wonder whether it would be possible at all.  I did
> eventually find a solution, a function dbgv such that dbgv[variableOne]
> produces exactly the effect of the print statement, but it's really ugly.
> I'll post it later.
>
> Granted this is not an important problem since it's not too much
> trouble to just type in the whole print statement.  But it's worth
> noting that this would trivial to solve with a Lisp macro, and despite
> the fantastic expressibility of Mathematica it doesn't seem to have a
> good replacement for macros.  The closest equivalents are $Pre(Read),
> which I used in my solution, but they're not nearly as nice to work with.
>
> Can anyone think of an elegant solution?
>



-- 
DrMajorBob at bigfoot.com


  • Prev by Date: Re: problem writing debugging utility function
  • Next by Date: Re: can SendMail use HTML and embedded images
  • Previous by thread: Re: problem writing debugging utility function
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: problem writing debugging utility function