[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Bug in Pattern Matching with Condition?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg97327] Re: [mg97279] Re: Bug in Pattern Matching with Condition?
*From*: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
*Date*: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:21:54 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <goqpe7$lrn$1@smc.vnet.net> <goqugt$ngp$1@smc.vnet.net> <200903101032.FAA09839@smc.vnet.net> <1F28FF59-BB99-48DE-8C96-7D7D0393FB5B@mimuw.edu.pl> <49B68279.9000305@metrohm.com>
Well, I can't answer this with any certainly but it seems to me
reasonable that _/;True should match anything just as _ does and that
_/;False should not match anything. It seems logical that if you agree
with that than you get "strange" behaviour as below:
MatchQ[a /; False, _ /; False]
False
MatchQ[a /; False, _ /; True]
True
It's not really an explanation but it does make sense (to me) so I
would say it is a feature.
Andrzej
On 10 Mar 2009, at 16:08, dh wrote:
> Thanks Andrzej. But this still does not explain why "Condition" acts
> so strangely. Is it a bug or feature?
> Daniel
>
> Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:
>> No, the Varbatim is wrapped around the Head, Condition not around
>> the entire expression. You can do it also with HoldPattern:
>> MatchQ[a /; b, HoldPattern[Condition][_, _]]
>> True
>> Once you hold the Head of the pattern expression it no longer has
>> its special meaning. You can check that Condition behaves is a very
>> special way when used in a pattern, e.g.
>> MatchQ[x, Condition[_, True]]
>> True
>> MatchQ[x, Condition[_, False]]
>> False
>> Of course if you replace Condition by Verbatim[Condition] or
>> HoldPattern[Condition] you will always get False.
>> Andrzej Kozlowski
>> On 10 Mar 2009, at 11:32, dh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>
>>> can you elaborate a bit. According to the definition of Verbatim ,
>>>
>>> Verbatim[Condition][_, _]] should match literally "Condition][_,
>>> _]" and
>>>
>>> not Condition[a, b]. Therefore it looks more like another bug to
>>> me and
>>>
>>> adds to the mystery of why MatchQ[Condition[a, b], Condition[_, _]]
>>>
>>> evaluates to False.
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jens-Peer Kuska wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> but
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> MatchQ[Condition[a, b], Verbatim[Condition][_, _]]
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>
>>>> Jens
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> cesar wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Hi Mathematica group, do you get any idea of
>>>
>>>>> why the following sentences don't give true?
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> MatchQ[Condition[a, b], Condition[_,_]]
>>>
>>>>> MatchQ[Condition[a, b], Condition[__]]
>>>
>>>>> MatchQ[Condition[a, b], HoldPattern[Condition[__]]]
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> Is this a bug?
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>>> Cesar
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> Daniel Huber
> Metrohm Ltd.
> Oberdorfstr. 68
> CH-9100 Herisau
> Tel. +41 71 353 8585, Fax +41 71 353 8907
> E-Mail:<mailto:dh at metrohm.com>
> Internet:<http://www.metrohm.com>
>
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: Wolfram/Alpha**
Next by Date:
**Share symbols among packages**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Re: Bug in Pattern Matching with Condition?**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Bug in Pattern Matching with Condition?**
| |