|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Bug with Hypergeometric2F1?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg99444] Re: [mg99422] Re: [mg99384] Bug with Hypergeometric2F1?
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 05:20:46 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200905050943.FAA20864@smc.vnet.net>
On 5 May 2009, at 18:43, Bob Hanlon wrote:
> Or change the function definition to force precision
>
> vol1[n_, k_] := Sum[Binomial[Rationalize[n, 0], i],
> {i, 0, Rationalize[k, 0]}]
>
> vol1 @@@ {{1000, 1}, {1000, 1.}, {1000., 1}, {1000., 1.}}
>
> {1001,1001,1001,1001}
>
>
> Bob Hanlon
Actually, in this case (when you use SetDelayed instead of Set as in
the original post) Rationalize is not needed:
vol1[n_, k_] := Sum[Binomial[n, i], {i, 0, k}]
vol1 @@@ {{1000, 1}, {1000, 1.}, {1000., 1}, {1000., 1.}}
{1001, 1001, 1001., 1001.}
Andrzej Kozlowski
Prev by Date:
Re: why does DownValues not return all downvalues for a
Next by Date:
GRAPHICS IN A DO LOOP DOES NOTHING
Previous by thread:
Re: Bug with Hypergeometric2F1?
Next by thread:
Re: Bug with Hypergeometric2F1?
|