Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: why does DownValues not return all

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg99465] Re: [mg99413] Re: [mg99369] why does DownValues not return all
  • From: Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net>
  • Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 05:24:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • Reply-to: hanlonr at cox.net

Not much there, but enter

??SubValues

or

Information[SubValues]


Bob Hanlon


---- Michael <michael2718 at gmail.com> wrote: 

=============
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Bob Hanlon <hanlonr at cox.net> wrote:
> v = DeleteCases[
>   ToExpression[Names["*Values"]],
>   SingularValues];
>
> g["x"]["y"] = 1;
>
> {#, #[g]} & /@ v


It appears that the function that returns what I need is called "SubValues"=
:

In[9]:= SubValues[g]

Out[9]= {HoldPattern[g["x"]["y"]] :> 1}


This function doesn't appear to be documented very well (it doesn't
have it's own page), but it is mentioned in passing a couple of
places.

Thanks for the help!

>
> Bob Hanlon

Michael

>
> ---- Michael <michael2718 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> =============
> I'm trying to get the functionality of "associative arrays" or "alist"
> or "hash tables"  to work in Mathematica.  However I'm seeing a quirk
> and I wonder if anybody can explain what is going on or suggest a
> better approach?
>
> I can define a simple associate array like so:
> f["red"]=1;
> f["blue"]=2;
> ...
> If all my parameters are strings, then I can find the "keys" to my
> alist with the following function:
> StringKeys[y_] := DownValues[y] /. {( _[y[str_String]] :> _) -> str};
> SetAttributes[StringKeys, HoldFirst];
>
> In[141]:= StringKeys[f]
>
> Out[141]= {"blue", "red"}
>
> However, if I try to define a more complex alist, I cannot find any
> way to retrieve the definition!
>
> In[142]:= g["x"]["y"] = 1;
>
> In[143]:=  DownValues[g]
>
> Out[143]= {}
>
> In[144]:= UpValues[g]
>
> Out[144]= {}
>
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Michael



  • Prev by Date: Re: Some function like Position[] but uses criteria, not pattern?
  • Next by Date: Re: "Sticky" options when using Plot[] -- bug or feature?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: derivative of a well-behaved function
  • Next by thread: Re: Some function like Position[] but uses criteria, not