|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Random choice
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg99832] Re: Random choice
- From: Ray Koopman <koopman at sfu.ca>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:25:07 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <guj8ef$hv6$1@smc.vnet.net>
On May 15, 1:17 am, Valeri Astanoff <astan... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Given this example :
>
> In[1]:= RandomChoice[Range[500], 100] // Union // Length
>
> Out[1]= 91
>
> what is the best way to get *exactly* 100 different
> random numbers ranging from 1 to 500 ?
>
> Any piece of advice would be appreciated.
>
> --
>
> Valeri Astanoff
RandomSample[Range[500], 100] // Union // Length
Given the well-established meaning of m_Choose_n for sampling without
replacement, whoever decided on the new terminology got RandomChoice
and RandomSample backwards.
Prev by Date:
Re: Random choice
Next by Date:
Re: Question about filenames for Export[...]
Previous by thread:
Re: Random choice
Next by thread:
Re: Random choice
|