Re: Logscale Tick Function
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg100078] Re: Logscale Tick Function
- From: lehin.p at gmail.com
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 23:39:15 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Hi! Thank you very much! I have not tested this code deeply but at the first look it is very nice and much easier to use for logscale than CustomTicks package http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/MathSource/5599 Up to this moment I did not know any alternative for this. It is obvious that your code may be enhanced and finally transformed into a Package for such easy use as it is in the case of CustomTicks package for linear axes. On 21 May, 08:04, "M.Roellig" <markus.roel... at googlemail.com> wrote: > P.S. Maybe my glasses are not as good as they used to be, but it looks > like Mathematica renders some of the subticks longer than the others. > The EPS output looks fine though. Did anybody else notice this? I think that Thomas Burton and David Park told formerly about this in this newsgroop: http://tinyurl.com/qdopam http://tinyurl.com/quona7 http://groups.google.ru/group/comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica/tree/browse_frm/thread/c495897da0fb2be4/f60e47372fd38acf?rnum=1&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fcomp.soft-sys.math.mathematica%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2Fc495897da0fb2be4%3F#doc_f60e47372fd38acf http://groups.google.ru/group/comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica/tree/browse_frm/thread/791824accd6ece15/5156d63b480fd33d?rnum=1&q=tick+length&_done=%2Fgroup%2Fcomp.soft-sys.math.mathematica%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fthread%2F791824accd6ece15%2Ff88e8d9cf2a7c98d%3Flnk%3Dg Good luck!