|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
subscripts in function definitions
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg105028] subscripts in function definitions
- From: Murat Tasan <mmuurr at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:59:33 -0500 (EST)
hi, folks - i'm not very savvy with Mathematica, so i apologize in
advance if this is a silly question, but:
i'd like to define a function, say f, that takes the symbol Subscript
[x,L]_.
it's hard to replicate what i'm typing here, without the ability to
subscript, but basically i want an x with a subscript of L as the
entire variable. something like xL (only with the L sub-scripted).
when i try to enter this as a pattern in the function definition by
adding the trailing underscore, it attaches only to the L (in the
subscript), not to the whole x_L variable (thus making the pattern
only match "L"). if i move out of the subscript box and try to add
the trailing underscore at the "x" level, it becomes detached from the
whole expression. so i tried creating the pattern explicitly, as so:
f[Subscript[x,L]_] := myfun
but also in this case the trailing underscore becomes non-associated
with the Subscript expression.
is there any way i can make x with a subscript of L the entire pattern
for a variable?
(hopefully this made some sense... hard to make clear what i'm
searching for in plain text!)
Prev by Date:
Re: Text on a curve, revisited and modified
Next by Date:
Permanent Computation Efficiency
Previous by thread:
Re: Define a function as a graphics directive?
Next by thread:
Re: subscripts in function definitions
|