Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Better Way of Testing and Replacing List Elements?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg103964] Re: [mg103949] Better Way of Testing and Replacing List Elements?
  • From: Carl Woll <carlw at wolfram.com>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:54:16 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200910140319.XAA22469@smc.vnet.net>

careysub wrote:
> The code below replaces the negative values in a list with zero, and
> is an example of a type of operation I use a lot:
>
> xxx = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, -6, -7, 8, 9, 10, -1, 11, 12};
> ReplacePart[xxx, Position[Map[Negative, xxx], True] -> 0]
>
> Is there a "better" way of doing this (fewer function calls, more
> efficient)?
>
> My feeling is that I'm doing this in an awkward way.
>
>   
Clip[xxx, {0, Infinity}] would be better.

Carl Woll
Wolfram Research


  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: The graph of (x + 2)^(1/5) + 4 not plotted
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica 7.01 and Mac OS 10.6 (Snow Leopard)
  • Previous by thread: Better Way of Testing and Replacing List Elements?
  • Next by thread: Re: Better Way of Testing and Replacing List Elements?